The role of cryptocurrency in the dynamics of blockchain-based social networks: The case of Steemit - PLOS ONE

in hive-160342 •  2 months ago 


( June 16, 2022; PLOS ONE )

Description: "To shed a light on this complex network of intertwined layers, we adopt a data-driven approach, by analyzing Steemit, one of the first and most successful BOSNs. By gathering data from the underlying blockchain Steem, we have collected a large longitudinal dataset that contains the main social and financial activities of Steemit users spanning more than three years, along with data external to the Steemit platform: longitudinal data of STEEM value in the cryptocurrency market. "





A shift of paradigm is running over online social platforms: the over-centralization of these platforms is leaving room for decentralized solutions based on blockchain technologies, such as blockchain-based online social networks—BOSNs. Among the many unknown aspects of these techno-social systems, the objective of this study is to propose an analytical framework to assess the impact of the cryptocurrencies linked to a BOSN platform on the evolution of its social network and on the behavior of their users, in terms of production of content and/or its promotion through a voting and rewarding system. The framework has been applied to Steemit, one of the most widespread BOSNs, from which we collected three-year-long high-resolution data on its evolution along with the price of its main cryptocurrencies. On users’ activities extracted from these longitudinal data, we applied a time-series correlation analysis and a correlation analysis between the action allocation strategies and the obtained rewards, in the case of most central accounts. The analysis has highlighted pieces of evidence of the influence of the cryptocurrency price on users’ actions, particularly on actions that shape the structure of the social networks. Second, we also found highly rewarded users prefer actions related to the promotion of content rather than the creation of high-quality content, exploiting the reward distribution mechanisms implemented by the platform. These findings highlight that the shift of paradigm towards blockchain and cryptocurrency technologies might strengthen the influence of financial and economic factors rather than relational/social aspects on the evolution of these new complex techno-social systems.



----
The analysis runs from December, 2016 through March, 2020. Here's a new acronym: "Blockchain-based online social networks (BOSNs)" ;-)

I don't have time to read it tonight, but I'll try to read it this weekend. From skimming, the authors suggest that cryptocurrency prices drive social activity, but there is little evidence in their analysis to suggest that social activity affects cryptocurrency prices. Also, there's not much correlation between cryptocurrency prices and financial transactions (like transfers, powering up, delegating, etc...)

Interesting bit of trivia is that the highest correlation between price and number of comments is 94% with a lag time of 15 days.
Read the rest from PLOS ONE: The role of cryptocurrency in the dynamics of blockchain-based social networks: The case of Steemit

---


50% of this post's author rewards are being directed to @penny4thoughts for distribution to authors of relevant and engaging comments. Please join the discussion below in order to be considered for a share of the liquid rewards when the post pays out.

Check the #penny4thoughts tag to find other active conversations.


###### This markdown/html was auto-generated by the java Steem Links Creator prototype application.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

we also found highly rewarded users prefer actions related to the promotion of content rather than the creation of high-quality content, exploiting the reward distribution mechanisms implemented by the platform.

This is not always true. Of course there are manipulative whales, sometimes goodwill whales just promote , for instance, their competition posts to attract more participants.

I agree that the price drives the activity, obviously this is a job, nice, but work, the reward motivates, now we receive more STEEM than SBD, it is something that demotivates, I guess it will change over time, I think not it's fair, there must be a balance in everything, well it's my humble opinion, I've been on this panel for 1 year, I'm persistent, so I'll keep going and we'll see

The way it's designed, the SBD and STEEM payouts would be equivalent. I honestly don't know why SBDs have traded so much higher on external markets.

Social interaction and interests don't affect crypto price in my opinion

Your post was upvoted and resteemed on @crypto.defrag

This post has been featured in the latest edition of Steem News...